If you interview people remotely for software engineering positions, then you need a strategy to deal with people cheating by using LLMs. One option is letting them do it and adjust your questions.
> why do you care how the code got there? The outcome isn’t different. They simply used a different tool than typing the code letter by letter. Shouldn’t they be lauded for using a tool that produces the correct result faster?
100% Agree. Interviews need to adjust to an LLM world, e.g. instead of writing functions, write a system with multiple features. More interesting to both interviewer/interviewee as well.
> why do you care how the code got there? The outcome isn’t different. They simply used a different tool than typing the code letter by letter. Shouldn’t they be lauded for using a tool that produces the correct result faster?
100% Agree. Interviews need to adjust to an LLM world, e.g. instead of writing functions, write a system with multiple features. More interesting to both interviewer/interviewee as well.